Why The C-Suite Must Shift From Generative AI Hype To Agentic AI Strategy

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) entered the enterprise with extraordinary momentum. It promised faster content creation, streamlined communication and new forms of knowledge access. A recent global survey from McKinsey even shows that 88% of organizations now use AI in at least one business function. But as the hype settled, executives found a more practical question rising to the surface: “How can organizations move from interesting demonstrations to sustainable enterprise value?”

Despite high usage, only a small share has scaled AI systems across the enterprise. The same report shows that only about 23% have expanded any AI solution across more than one business unit.

This is the central gap confronting the C-suite in 2025. Leaders do not need more generative AI experimentation; they need a pivot toward agentic AI, which refers to AI systems that act within a workflow, complete tasks, use tools, apply reasoning and deliver measurable business value.

What Makes Agentic AI Different

GenAI focuses on producing content, drafting summaries or suggesting insights. Agentic AI focuses on taking action. It can analyze information, choose a next step, use approved tools and complete tasks that connect to operational outcomes.

Industry data shows that many AI pilots struggle because they stop at output rather than execution. In the 2025 ISG enterprise AI adoption report, only 31% of prioritized use cases reached full production.

Executives should see this as evidence of a structural shift. Value will no longer be derived from AI models that simply respond to prompts. It will come from systems that integrate with existing processes, work with structured and unstructured knowledge and take actions that produce measurable results.

Why Many AI Programs Stall

AI programs often falter in the gap between experimentation and operationalization. A Wharton-led study published in 2025 found that while 82% of organizations use generative AI at least weekly, far fewer have been able to convert that usage into true ROI.

The research highlights a common pattern. Organizations pursue early pilots without clear goals, measurable metrics or executive alignment. They treat AI as a tool for novelty rather than a capability tied to business processes.

Another challenge comes from the disconnect between executive expectations and employee adoption. A survey conducted by Writer reported that 97% of executives believe generative AI is beneficial, but only 88% of employees feel the same.

This signals the need for change management, workflow redesign and clear communication. AI that does not align with how people work rarely scales.

Strategic Imperatives for Executive Leadership

To shift from generative to agentic AI, C-suite leaders should focus on three core areas: autonomy, value and trust.

1. Define autonomy-driven outcomes.

Agentic AI becomes effective when leaders identify processes where AI can take action. These may include IT service resolution, knowledge management, compliance monitoring or procurement workflows. In the 2025 McKinsey survey, organizations that reported the highest impact were those that applied AI to knowledge-intensive operations.

2. Link AI actions to measurable value.

Successful companies do not stop at productivity gains. They tie AI to growth-oriented outcomes such as accelerated customer response, faster sales cycles or improved accuracy in decision support. Clear key performance indicators are essential. Without them, AI remains a novelty rather than an investment.

3. Strengthen governance and trust.

Autonomy increases both value and risk. In the aforementioned McKinsey survey, 51% of organizations using AI reported at least one negative consequence such as incorrect outputs or compliance concerns. Leaders must build governance frameworks that include data quality management, transparency controls and approved tool usage.

A Practical Roadmap For Agentic AI Adoption

A successful transition to agentic AI requires a clear and disciplined approach that connects strategy, governance and operational readiness.

The first priority is to identify high-volume processes that generate measurable value once automated. Workflows that involve frequent transactions or constant retrieval of internal knowledge are strong candidates. Examples include service desk routing, customer claims intake, internal information queries and documentation review for compliance. These areas reveal early gains because they contain repeatable steps that an AI system can act upon with consistency and measurable impact.

A second priority is the creation of a cross-functional governance structure. This group should bring together leaders from IT, business operations, compliance, risk management and knowledge management. Its purpose is to align AI initiatives with enterprise strategy and to confirm that each proposed pilot has a business case grounded in real operational needs. When governance begins early, organizations avoid the common pattern of pilots launched without clarity about ownership, accountability or the intended outcome.

Short pilot cycles form the third part of the roadmap. Rather than lengthy experiments, the general consensus is that organizations benefit from pilot windows of roughly 90 to 120 days. Each pilot should have defined thresholds for success, such as reductions in handling time, improvements in accuracy or gains in employee efficiency. Research from the 2025 ISG enterprise AI adoption study, for example, shows that organizations using agile pilot cycles reach production more quickly and more reliably than those using extended timelines.

The fourth priority is investment in the enterprise knowledge foundation. Agentic AI cannot act reliably without high-quality data, clean metadata, well-structured knowledge graphs and secure integration points. These elements form the backbone that allows an AI system to interpret information correctly and execute tasks within approved boundaries. Without this preparation, models will struggle to perform consistently and may create new risks instead of solving existing ones.

The final element of the roadmap is the development of a culture that supports human AI collaboration. Even the most advanced agentic systems require oversight, context and human judgment. Employees need to understand how the system operates, how decisions are made and how to intervene when needed. Training, role redesign and regular communication all play critical roles. Organizations that invest in this cultural foundation build trust and ensure that AI adoption strengthens, rather than disrupts, the workforce experience.

Source

Why The C-Suite Must Shift From GenAI Hype To An Agentic AI Strategy